<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abstract Painting &#8211; Three Approaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theblindswimmer.com/2008/11/12/abstract-painting-three-approaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theblindswimmer.com/2008/11/12/abstract-painting-three-approaches/</link>
	<description>a blog of painting, abstraction, and contemporary art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:55:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Craven</title>
		<link>http://theblindswimmer.com/2008/11/12/abstract-painting-three-approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblindswimmer.com/2008/11/12/abstract-painting-three-approaches/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>That particular Richter for me is straight out of Kandinsky and although I don&#039;t know much about him or his work, I do know that he allows the painting to create itself almost as he responds to each layer. This was a method Klee used, so maybe there is something in the Kandinsky, Klee, Bauhaus relationship, or maybe I know nothing. Thanks for the articles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That particular Richter for me is straight out of Kandinsky and although I don&#8217;t know much about him or his work, I do know that he allows the painting to create itself almost as he responds to each layer. This was a method Klee used, so maybe there is something in the Kandinsky, Klee, Bauhaus relationship, or maybe I know nothing. Thanks for the articles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Polo Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://theblindswimmer.com/2008/11/12/abstract-painting-three-approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Polo Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblindswimmer.com/2008/11/12/abstract-painting-three-approaches/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Nice overview of the three approaches.  Just starting to look at Mitchell&#039;s work and can&#039;t get past thinking much of work is short hand for impressionism, specifically Monet.  Any other insights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice overview of the three approaches.  Just starting to look at Mitchell&#8217;s work and can&#8217;t get past thinking much of work is short hand for impressionism, specifically Monet.  Any other insights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

