« the origins of the blind swimmer
» Ronnie Landfield

abstraction

The Abstract Language

02.23.08 | 2 Comments

As a human my experience is embodied. I am not a disembodied reason or a brain in a vat. For a more in depth discussion see Lakoff and Johnson’s Philosophy in the Flesh. In other words, Descartes’ idea that “I think, therefore I am” is totally wrong. The language of representation is built on linear perspective, an “abstraction” that is not true to our embodied experience. Thus most representational work feels dead. The exceptions are when the artists breaks the rules…but that’s a whole other discussion (David Hockney talks at length about these issues in a number of his books). Anyway, the language of abstract painting is the language of shapes and forms, of color, of overlapping plains, on a flat surface. When we as abstract artists speak in this language, we create paintings that have more life, are more real. They become living moving objects, because the surface of the canvas has been activated. Shapes, forms, colors, gestures, marks, etc. become carriers for our thoughts and feelings, both conscious and subconscious. Creating an abstract piece of work can be described as the process of embodiment of the artist’s thoughts, feelings, desires, etc. in paint.

related



del.icio.us | Digg it | Furl | reddit | StumbleUpon | Yahoo MyWeb |

2 Comments

have your say

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. Subscribe to these comments.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

:

:


« the origins of the blind swimmer
» Ronnie Landfield